Educators: Earn a free Gold upgrade by joining the PBwiki Back To School Challenge.
Group 2 - Gay Marriage
Give this website the CRAP Test:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_marr.htm
- Currency -
- How recent is the information?
- How recently has the website been updated?
- Is it current enough for your topic?
- Reliability -
- What kind of information is included in the resource?
- Is content of the resource primarily opinion? Is is balanced?
- Does the creator provide references or sources for data or quotations?
- Authority -
- Who is the creator or author?
- What are the credentials?
- Who is the published or sponsor?
- Are they reputable?
- What is the publisher's interest (if any) in this information?
- Are there advertisements on the website?
- Purpose/Point of View -
- Is this fact or opinion?
- Is it biased?
- Is the creator/author trying to sell you something?
Now write the annotation based on the CRAP test.
Write 4 or 5 sentences about the resource based on the criteria and the questions above.
Annotation:
Currency- The information from this source is not very recent. There is some information from 1967, 2000, 2003, and 2004. I would say that this source is not very current for this topic.
Reliability- This information included from this source is primarily from a religious perspective (ex. one man one woman to marry). I would say that this information does have some quotations, but nothing related to the topic of research. Some of the information was taken from newspaper, the press, and the websites are not reliable links.
Authority- The creator of this website are the Ontario Consultants on religious . The published sponsors are several persons from various newspapers. The publishers interest in this information is the status of marriage in the U.S. which is common-sense, one man one woman. There are also advertisements on the site.
Purpose- There are some facts and some opinions. The information is bias because the information collected relates back to the religious aspects of marriage. No the creator is not trying to sell anything.
Currency- The information from this source is not very recent. There is some information from 1967, 2000, 2003, and 2004. I would say that this source is not very current for this topic.
Reliability- This information included from this source is primarily from a religious perspective (ex. one man one woman to marry). I would say that this information does have some quotations, but nothing related to the topic of research. Some of the information was taken from newspaper, the press, and the websites are not reliable links.
Authority- The creator of this website are the Ontario Consultants on religious . The published sponsors are several persons from various newspapers. The publishers interest in this information is the status of marriage in the U.S. which is common-sense, one man one woman. There are also advertisements on the site.
Purpose- There are some facts and some opinions. The information is bias because the information collected relates back to the religious aspects of marriage. No the creator is not trying to sell anything.
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |
Create your own educational wiki!